Data-Driven Analysis of Customer Return Behavior and Fraudulent Patterns in Indian E-Commerce

Authors

  • Sonali Sharma Data Science, MVGR College of Engineering, Vizianagaram, India
  • Sadu Atchuta Rao Data Science, MVGR College of Engineering, Vizianagaram, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69968/ijisem.2026v5i1274-280

Keywords:

Commerce Return Fraud, Wardrobing, Geometric Deep Learning, GraphSAGE, XGBoost, Geospatial Hotspot Analysis

Abstract

The rapid growth of the Indian e-commerce sector has brought a parallel rise in "wardrobing" and return abuse, where customers purchase items for temporary use and return them for a full refund. Traditional fraud detection systems, particularly tabular models like XGBoost, frequently fail to catch this behavior because they treat every transaction as an isolated event, completely missing the structural "guilt-by-association" patterns inherent in organized fraud. To address this gap, this paper presents a Graph Neural Network (GNN) framework integrated with geospatial hotspot analysis to detect behavioral fraud across a unified Indian market dataset. We benchmarked three distinct architectures to handle this complexity: XGBoost, GraphSAGE, and Graph Attention Networks (GAT). Our comparative analysis revealed that while the XGBoost baseline achieved high overall accuracy, it suffered from a severe bias toward the majority class, missing 61% of actual fraud cases. GraphSAGE emerged as the champion model; by utilizing inductive learning and neighborhood aggregation, it successfully mapped user-item relationships and improved the fraud detection recall rate by 21% over the baseline. Conversely, the more complex GAT architecture struggled with the dataset's extreme class imbalance and overfit the noise. Ultimately, this research demonstrates that transitioning from flat data to Geometric Deep Learning, combined with regional hotspot tracking, is essential for securing modern retail platforms against subtle behavioral abuse.

References

[1]. Reddy, S. R. B., Kanagala, P., Ravichandran, P., et al. "Effective fraud detection in e-commerce: Leveraging machine learning and big data analytics." Measurement: Sensors, vol. 33, 101138, 2024.

[2]. Alexander, I., Lai, C., & Yang, H. C. "Deep Learning Based Behavior Anomaly Detection within the Context of Electronic Commerce." 2023 IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI), pp. 1-6, 2023.

[3]. Tax, N., de Vries, K. J., de Jong, M., et al. "Machine learning for fraud detection in e-Commerce: A research agenda." Deployable Machine Learning for Security Defense, Springer, pp. 30-54, 2021.

[4]. Mendonça, R., Salazar, A., & Martinez, E. "Graph-Based Deep Learning for E-Commerce Fraud Detection." ResearchGate, March 2025.

[5]. Zhang, G., Li, Z., Huang, J., et al. "EFraudCom: an e-commerce fraud detection system via competitive graph neural networks." Macquarie University Research Outputs, 2024.

[6]. Wang, X., & Zhang, L. "Graph Neural Networks for Fraud Detection in E-commerce Transactions." 2024 International Conference on Computing, Sciences and Communications (ICCSC), IEEE Xplore, 2024.

[7]. Li, Y., et al. "HMOA-GNN: adaptive adversarial GraphSAGE with hierarchical hybrid sampling and metric-optimized graph construction for credit card fraud detection." PMC, Dec. 2025.

[8]. NVIDIA. "Supercharging Fraud Detection in Financial Services with Graph Neural Networks." NVIDIA Technical Blog, 2024.

[9]. Jabri, J. "Fraud detection with GNN." Kaggle, Jan. 2023.

[10]. Chen, Z., et al. "Application of GraphSAGE in Financial Fraud Detection within Dynamic Social Networks." IEEE Xplore, July 2025.

[11]. Wang, Y., et al. "GDFGAT: Graph attention network based on feature difference weight assignment for telecom fraud detection." PLOS One, 2025.

[12]. Mienye, I. D., & Sun, Y. "Graph attention networks for credit card fraud detection: A relational learning approach." World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 26(03), pp. 2580-2585, 2025.

[13]. Cherif, et al. "Detecting Imbalanced Credit Card Fraud via Hybrid Graph Attention and Variational Autoencoder Ensembles." MDPI, 2024.

[14]. Mangopay. "How to prevent return fraud with machine learning models." Mangopay Blog, May 2024.

[15]. Ekata. "Return fraud: The $100 billion problem facing retailers." Ekata, Feb. 2024.

[16]. Zengler, T., et al. "The Role of AI in Preventing Return Fraud: A Study of Amazon's Flexible Return Policy and Consumer Behavior." ResearchGate, Sept. 2024

Downloads

Published

13-03-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Sonali Sharma, & Sadu Atchuta Rao. (2026). Data-Driven Analysis of Customer Return Behavior and Fraudulent Patterns in Indian E-Commerce. International Journal of Innovations in Science Engineering And Management, 5(1), 274-280. https://doi.org/10.69968/ijisem.2026v5i1274-280